KingMakers IAS Academy logo

EIA – purpose and its implementation in India

EIA – purpose and its implementation in India

UPSC CSE Mains Syllabus: GS-3-   Conservation, environmental pollution and degradation, environmental impact assessment

EIA – purpose and its implementation in India

Purpose of EIA:

  • Around the world, legislative interventions mandating EIAs began to burgeon in the late 1960s.
  • The basic credo of these measures was to ensure that the state had at its possession a disinterested analysis of any development project and the potential impact that it might have on the environment.
  • The purpose of the EIA process is to inform decision-makers and the public of the environmental consequences of implementing a proposed project. The EIA document itself is a technical tool that identifies, predicts, and analyzes impacts on the physical environment, as well as social, cultural, and health impacts.
  • It explains and compares the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed activity and its modifications, including its variants, even in comparison with “no action”;
  • It is used to identify measures which prevent pollution of the environment, mitigate the environmental pollution or prevent damaging the environment.
  • It helps in acquiring expert supporting documentation for issuing a decision on the permit of activity and its modification under special regulations.

EIA and India:

  • It took India, though, until 1994 before it notified its first set of assessment norms, under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
  • This policy mandated that projects beyond a certain size from certain sectors — such as mining, thermal power plants, ports, airports and atomic energy — secure an environmental clearance as a precondition to their commencement.
  • But the notification was subject to regular amendments and diluted the EIA principles.
  • In 2006, a new EIA programme was conceived.
  • There was a belief that the 1994 system hindered speedy growth.
  • The new draft attempted to decentralise the process.
  • It increased the number of projects that required an environmental clearance.
  • It also created appraisal committees at the level of both the Centre and States, the recommendations of which were made a qualification for a sanctioning.
  • The programme also mandated that pollution control boards hold a public hearing to glean the concerns of those living around the site of a project.
  • But, in practice, the 2006 notification also proved regressive.
  • However, the course retained some opacity.
  • The final EIA report, was not made available to the public; the procedure for securing clearances for certain kinds of projects was accelerated; and there was little scope available for independent judicial review.
  • The clearances were challenged; the courts upheld the views of the assessment authorities.
  • In the process, EIAs, far from serving as a bulwark for environmental justice, came to be regarded as a bureaucratic exercise.

Current Draft EIA:

  • As many campaigners have highlighted, the new draft is riddled with problems.
  • It enables a sweeping clearance apparatus to a number of critical projects that previously required an EIA of special rigour.
  • Earlier, where some industries require expert appraisal under the existing 2006 notification, they will, under the new notification, be subject to less demanding processes.
  • These include aerial ropeways, metallurgical industries, and a raft of irrigation projects, among others.
  • The new proposal does not strengthen the expert appraisal committees on which so much responsibility is reposed.
  • It also does away with the need for public consultation for a slew of different sectors. This negates a redeeming feature of the 2006 notification.
  • But, most egregiously, the proposal opens up a window for securing post-facto clearances.
  • That is, companies which have commenced a project without a valid certificate will be allowed to regularise their operations by paying a fine.

Way forward:

  • A mere strengthening of the existing EIA norms will not by itself be sufficient.
  • We need a renewed vision for the country; one that sees the protection of the environment as not merely a value unto itself but as something even more foundational to our democracy. To that end, we must begin to imagine a future where, our ecological and egalitarian projects can fuse together.
  • For this to happen, there is a need to see ourselves as not distinct from the environment that we live in, but as an intrinsic part of it.
  • Under such a model, our economic solutions will have to necessarily subsume a commitment to our natural surroundings. To achieve this broader vision we will need deeper thinking, greater political initiative, and a leap of faith.

Source:”The Hindu”.


What is the purpose of having an Environmental Impact Assessment process? How effective has it been in India?