{"id":4363,"date":"2026-11-01T03:50:39","date_gmt":"2026-11-01T03:50:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/?p=4363"},"modified":"2026-11-04T03:59:01","modified_gmt":"2026-11-04T03:59:01","slug":"freedom-of-expression","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/freedom-of-expression\/","title":{"rendered":"Freedom of Expression\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"<table style=\"font-size: 16px; font-style: normal;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<blockquote><p><b>SYLLABUS: Indian Polity<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>General Studies \u2013 :\u00a0 II <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Structure, organization and functioning of the Executive and the Judiciary\u2014Ministries and Departments of the Government; pressure groups and formal\/informal associations and their role in the Polity.<\/span><b>\u00a0<\/b><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><b>IN NEWS:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Why are social media takedowns in focus?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>QUESTION: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Examine the constitutional and legal framework governing the blocking of online content in India. How can the State balance public order with freedom of speech and expression under Article 19?(15 Marks, 250 words)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>ANSWER: <\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The regulation of online content in India sits at the intersection of state sovereignty, public order, and fundamental civil liberties. While Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution guarantees the Freedom of Speech and Expression to all citizens, this right is not absolute and is subject to &#8220;reasonable restrictions&#8221; under Article 19(2).<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><b>Constitutional Basis: Article 19(1)(a) vs. Article 19(2)<\/b><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Scope of Online Free Speech:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Article 19(1)(a) guarantees the freedom of speech and expression, which extends to digital media and internet access (<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India, 2020<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">). Speech cannot be restricted on grounds outside the eight exhaustive heads under Article 19(2).<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>The High Threshold of &#8220;Public Order&#8221;:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> In <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of Bihar (1966)<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, the Supreme Court distinguished &#8220;law and order,&#8221; &#8220;public order,&#8221; and &#8220;security of the State.&#8221; To restrict speech under &#8220;public order,&#8221; there must be a direct, proximate, and immediate threat to public tranquility\u2014satisfying the &#8220;spark in a powder keg&#8221; test rather than hypothetical or remote harm.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>The Doctrine of Proportionality:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> As affirmed in <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">K.S. Puttaswamy (2017)<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Anuradha Bhasin (2020)<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, state restrictions on free speech must satisfy four tests: <\/span><b>legitimate goal<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><b>rational connection<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><b>necessity (least restrictive means)<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, and <\/span><b>proportionality strictu sensu<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (balancing severity against outcome).<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>Statutory Architecture Governing Blocking<\/b><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Section 69A of the IT Act, 2000:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Empowers the Central Government (or delegated officers) to issue directions to block public access to information on specific grounds: sovereignty\/integrity of India, defense, security of State, friendly relations with foreign States, or public order.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>IT (Blocking Rules) 2009 \u2014 Operational Controls:<\/b>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><b>Designated Officer &amp; Inter-Ministerial Committee:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Screening mechanism to examine blocking requests.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><b>Pre-Decisional Hearing:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Requirement to issue notice and grant a hearing to the creator or platform before blocking.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><b>Review Committee:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Executive oversight committee headed by the Cabinet Secretary to review blocking orders every two months.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"2\"><b>Rule 9 (Emergency Blocking):<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Allows temporary blocking without a prior hearing in urgent situations, subject to post-facto committee approval.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Section 79 &amp; IT Intermediary Rules, 2021:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Intermediaries enjoy &#8220;safe harbour&#8221; immunity from third-party content liability only if they exercise due diligence and act upon actual knowledge (court orders or authorized government directions under Section 69A).<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>Judicial Jurisprudence &amp; Standards of Review<\/b><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015):<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The Supreme Court struck down Section 66A for vagueness and overbreadth, but <\/span><b>upheld Section 69A<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. The Court ruled that Section 69A is constitutional because it contains built-in procedural safeguards: reasoned written orders, mandatory hearings, and Review Committee scrutiny.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020):<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Laid down that indefinite digital bans or access restrictions are unconstitutional. Mandatory publication of blocking orders was established as a prerequisite for judicial review under Article 32\/226.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>X Corp v. Union of India (Karnataka High Court, 2023):<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Confirmed that account-level blocking (instead of post-level blocking) is permissible under Section 69A in repeat offender cases, provided individual orders remain reasoned, targeted, and subject to judicial scrutiny.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>Critical Friction Points &amp; Constitutional Concerns<\/b><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Rule 16 Confidentiality &amp; Opaque Executive Orders:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Rule 16 of the 2009 Blocking Rules mandates strict secrecy of all blocking requests and actions. This prevents content creators and citizens from knowing <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">why<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> content was removed, directly impairing the right to judicial remedy under Article 226\/32.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Bypassing Regular Procedure via Emergency Powers:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Standard procedural requirements (reasoned orders and pre-decisional hearings) are frequently bypassed by routinely invoking Rule 9 emergency powers for standard public order administration.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Overbreadth &amp; Account-Level Censorship:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Blocking entire accounts rather than specific illegal posts leads to prior restraint and overbreadth, censoring future lawful speech alongside targeted unlawful posts.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Institutional Conflict in Oversight:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The Review Committee under the 2009 Rules comprises executive officials reviewing executive actions, creating a structural absence of independent oversight.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3><b>Way Forward: Rebalancing Public Order and Speech<\/b><\/h3>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Proportionality-First Enforcement:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Executive authorities must exhaust less restrictive measures\u2014such as warning notices, content flags, or post-level geo-blocking\u2014before resorting to full account bans or domain blocking.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Publication of Reasoned Orders:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> To comply with <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Anuradha Bhasin<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, non-confidential summaries and legal grounds of blocking orders must be made public to preserve accountability and enable judicial review.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Reforming the Oversight Structure:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Introduce an independent judicial or parliamentary member into the Section 69A Review Committee to break single-branch executive review.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Narrow Interpretation of Incitement:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Administrative machinery must strictly separate sharp political criticism, satire, and dissent from imminent incitement to violence, keeping state intervention anchored to the strict boundaries of Article 19(2).<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<blockquote><p><b>PYQ REFERENCE UPSC 2013<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&#8220;What do you understand by the concept \u2018freedom of speech and expression\u2019? Does it cover hate speech also? Why has the Section 66A of Information Technology Act, 2000 been in news recently?&#8221;<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><b>SOURCE: <a href=\"https:\/\/epaper.thehindu.com\/ccidist-ws\/th\/th_international\/issues\/211731\/OPS\/G4JGN2BFD.1+GKLGO6LJK.1.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Hindu epaper &#8211; Why are social media takedowns in focus?<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SYLLABUS: Indian Polity General Studies \u2013 :\u00a0 II Structure, organization and functioning of the Executive and the Judiciary\u2014Ministries and Departments [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4364,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"set","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,68,25,57],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4363","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-daws","category-daily-current-affairs","category-gs-2","category-polity"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4363","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4363"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4363\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4365,"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4363\/revisions\/4365"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4364"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4363"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4363"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4363"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}