{"id":3704,"date":"2026-04-29T15:13:02","date_gmt":"2026-04-29T15:13:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/iasquest.com\/?p=3704"},"modified":"2026-04-29T15:13:03","modified_gmt":"2026-04-29T15:13:03","slug":"rte-act-ethics-case-study","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/rte-act-ethics-case-study\/","title":{"rendered":"RTE Act &#038; Ethics Case Study"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-1 wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"color:#ff0000\"><strong>1. Analyse the ethical obligations of private schools in implementing Section 12(1)(c). How should conflicts between institutional autonomy and social justice be resolved?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-background has-link-color\" style=\"background-color:#d9f8d9\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Syllabus:<\/strong><br><strong>Ethics<\/strong> General Studies \u2013 : IV Public\/Civil service values and Ethics in Public administration: Status and problems; ethical concerns and dilemmas in government and private institutions; laws, rules, regulations and conscience as sources of ethical guidance; accountability and ethical governance; strengthening of ethical and moral values in governance; ethical issues in international relations and funding; corporate governance.\u00a0 <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-2 wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>IN NEWS:<\/strong> The RTE Act and the idea of social inclusion<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-3 wp-block-paragraph\">Section 12(1)(c) of the Right to Education (RTE) Act is a landmark provision in Indian law, mandating that private unaided schools reserve <strong>25% of their entry-level seats<\/strong> for children from Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) and disadvantaged groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-4 wp-block-paragraph\">This creates a unique ethical tension between the private right to manage an institution and the public duty to foster an equitable society.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color has-medium-font-size wp-elements-5\"><a><\/a><strong>Ethical Obligations of Private Schools<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-6 wp-block-paragraph\">The ethical framework for private schools under RTE is grounded in the concept of <strong>social distributive justice<\/strong>. While these schools are private entities, they operate within a social ecosystem and benefit from state-provided infrastructure (like land at concessional rates or tax exemptions).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-block-list wp-elements-7\">\n<li><strong>Integration and Non-Discrimination:<\/strong> Schools have a moral duty beyond mere admission. They must ensure that EWS students are not &#8220;ghettoized&#8221; within the school. This includes preventing social stigma and ensuring equal participation in all extracurricular activities.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Equitable Resource Distribution:<\/strong> Ethically, schools must ensure that the quality of pedagogy and resources\u2014from sports equipment to library access\u2014is shared equally, regardless of the student\u2019s fee-paying status.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Fostering Empathy:<\/strong> Private schools serve as a microcosm of society. By implementing the quota, they fulfill an obligation to teach their &#8220;general category&#8221; students about diversity, privilege, and social reality, which is essential for holistic character building.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color has-medium-font-size wp-elements-8\"><a><\/a><strong>The Conflict: Institutional Autonomy vs. Social Justice<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-9 wp-block-paragraph\">The tension arises because private schools often view themselves as autonomous &#8220;islands of excellence,&#8221; while the state views them as partners in the &#8220;public function&#8221; of education.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Point of Conflict<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Institutional Autonomy Perspective<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Social Justice Perspective<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Financial Viability<\/strong><\/td><td>Schools argue that delayed government reimbursements threaten their financial health and quality of service.<\/td><td>Education is a &#8220;social good,&#8221; and private profits should not be prioritized over the fundamental right to education.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Pedagogical Freedom<\/strong><\/td><td>Schools fear that state-mandated quotas interfere with their unique culture, mission, and selection criteria.<\/td><td>Diversity is a pedagogical strength. Homogeneous classrooms create &#8220;echo chambers&#8221; of privilege.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Administrative Control<\/strong><\/td><td>Private management seeks total control over admissions to maintain specific standards.<\/td><td>State intervention is necessary to correct historical exclusions and systemic inequality.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color has-medium-font-size wp-elements-10\"><a><\/a><strong>Resolving the Conflict<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-11 wp-block-paragraph\">Resolving these tensions requires moving away from an &#8220;either-or&#8221; mindset toward a <strong>Collaborative Governance<\/strong> model.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color has-medium-font-size wp-elements-12\"><a><\/a><strong>1. The &#8220;Social Contract&#8221; Approach<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-13 wp-block-paragraph\">Institutional autonomy is not an absolute right; it is a delegated power from the state. Schools should view the 25% mandate as a &#8220;social tax&#8221; for the privilege of operating within a democratic society. In return, the state must fulfill its end of the contract by providing <strong>timely and fair-market reimbursements<\/strong> to ensure the school&#8217;s viability is not compromised.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-14 wp-block-paragraph\">Example: Some schools in Delhi have implemented a &#8220;Uniformity Policy&#8221; where the cost of all mandatory trips is baked into the general fee structure or sponsored by the school\u2019s alumni association to avoid pointing out who cannot pay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color has-medium-font-size wp-elements-15\"><a><\/a><strong>2. Proportionality and Subsidiarity<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-16 wp-block-paragraph\">Conflicts should be resolved using the principle of <strong>proportionality<\/strong>. The state should intervene in admissions (to ensure justice) but should refrain from micromanaging the school\u2019s internal curriculum or religious\/philosophical identity (preserving autonomy), provided that identity does not promote discrimination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-17 wp-block-paragraph\">Example: Providing refurbished laptops from the school\u2019s IT lab to EWS households during term time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color has-medium-font-size wp-elements-18\"><a><\/a><strong>3. Inclusion over Integration<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-19 wp-block-paragraph\">Integration is just &#8220;putting kids in the same room.&#8221; <strong>Inclusion<\/strong> is changing the room to accommodate everyone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-block-list wp-elements-20\">\n<li><strong>Sensitivity Training:<\/strong> Mandatory training for staff to eliminate subconscious bias against EWS students.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Bridge Courses:<\/strong> Schools should exercise their autonomy to create innovative &#8220;catch-up&#8221; programs that help disadvantaged students bridge the learning gap without lowering overall academic standards.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color has-medium-font-size wp-elements-21\"><a><\/a><strong>4. Judicial Balancing<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-22 wp-block-paragraph\">As seen in the <em>Society for Unaided Private Schools of Rajasthan v. Union of India<\/em> case, the courts have upheld that the RTE Act does not violate the &#8220;right to carry on any occupation.&#8221; The resolution lies in the legal understanding that <strong>education is a mission, not a business.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-23 wp-block-paragraph\">Ultimately, the goal is to transform private schools from exclusive enclaves into <strong>inclusive communities<\/strong>. The resolution of the conflict lies in recognizing that institutional excellence and social justice are not mutually exclusive\u2014rather, a school is only truly &#8220;excellent&#8221; if it can successfully educate a diverse demographic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-background has-link-color\" style=\"background-color:#a4d8f8\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>PYQ REFERENCE UPSC 2022<\/strong> <br>Q. &#8220;Social values are more important than economic values. Discuss this statement with examples in the context of inclusive growth of a nation.&#8221;<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-24 wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"color:#2900ff\"><strong>Source:<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/epaper.thehindu.com\/ccidist-ws\/th\/th_international\/issues\/182610\/OPS\/G92FSM5QG.1+GN6FTP914.1.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>https:\/\/epaper.thehindu.com\/ccidist-ws\/th\/th_international\/issues\/182610\/OPS\/G92FSM5QG.1+GN6FTP914.1.html<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color has-medium-font-size wp-elements-25\"><a><\/a><strong>2. Case Study<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-26 wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"color:#ff0000\"><strong>2. A high-profile corruption case relating to an excise policy decision comes up before a High Court. The case involves a former Chief Minister, Mr. Raghavan, and other senior public officials. A trial court had earlier discharged the accused, but the State Anti-Corruption Bureau has challenged this decision. The matter is listed before a senior judge, Justice Meenakshi Iyer, who is widely regarded as competent and firm in her judicial approach. However, during earlier stages of the same case, she had made certain observations that were perceived as critical of the accused.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-27 wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"color:#ff0000\"><strong>When the case is taken up, Mr. Raghavan, appearing in person, files a plea requesting the judge to recuse herself. He argues that her prior adverse remarks create a perception of pre-judgment. He further points out that the judge had attended events organised by a lawyers\u2019 body perceived to be ideologically aligned with the ruling establishment. Additionally, a close family member of the judge is empanelled as legal counsel for the government, which is a party to the case. He also cites public statements made by influential political leaders expressing confidence about the outcome of the case. Based on these factors, he contends that there exists a reasonable apprehension of bias, even if no actual bias can be proven.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-background has-link-color\" style=\"background-color:#d9f8d9\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Syllabus: <\/strong><br><strong>Ethics<\/strong> General Studies \u2013 : IV Attitude: content, structure, function; its influence and relation with thought and behavior; moral and political attitudes; social influence and persuasion.\u00a0 <\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-28 wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>IN NEWS:<\/strong> A recusal test the Delhi High Court failed<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-29 wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"color:#ff0000\"><strong>Justice Iyer refuses to recuse herself and passes an order stating that judges cannot step aside merely on the basis of unfounded or speculative allegations, as it may encourage litigants to indulge in \u201cbench hunting.\u201d She emphasises that there is a presumption of judicial impartiality and that recusal must be based on concrete evidence of bias rather than perceptions. She further asserts that her professional and personal associations do not influence her judicial decisions.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-30 wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"color:#ff0000\"><strong>Questions:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-31 wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"color:#ff0000\"><strong>1. <\/strong><strong>Identify and discuss the ethical issues involved in the above case.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-32 wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"color:#ff0000\"><strong>2. Examine the distinction between \u201cactual bias\u201d and \u201creasonable apprehension of bias\u201d in the context of judicial conduct.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-33 wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"color:#ff0000\"><strong>3. Suggest institutional measures to ensure transparency and fairness in handling recusal requests in the judiciary.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-34 wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>ANSWER:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-35 wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"color:#ff0000\"><strong>1. Identify and discuss the ethical issues involved in the above case.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-36\"><a><\/a><strong>1. Ethical Issues Involved<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-37 wp-block-paragraph\">Several ethical dimensions emerge from this scenario, centering on the <strong>Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-block-list wp-elements-38\">\n<li><strong>Impartiality vs. Duty to Sit:<\/strong> Justice Iyer faces the ethical dilemma of &#8220;duty to sit.&#8221; While a judge should not hear a case where bias exists, they also have an ethical obligation not to recuse themselves too easily, as doing so allows litigants to engage in <strong>&#8220;forum shopping&#8221;<\/strong> or &#8220;bench hunting,&#8221; effectively choosing their own judge by making strategic allegations.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Conflict of Interest (Familial Ties):<\/strong> The fact that a close family member is empanelled for the government (a party in the case) creates a potential conflict. Even if the relative is not arguing <em>this<\/em> specific case, the financial or professional benefit to the family unit can cloud the perception of neutrality.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Appearance of Propriety:<\/strong> Ethical conduct for a judge extends beyond the courtroom. Attending events organized by ideologically aligned bodies, while perhaps personally innocent, can ethically compromise the &#8220;appearance&#8221; of neutrality required by the high office.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Pre-judgment vs. Judicial Observations:<\/strong> Judges often make &#8220;interim observations&#8221; to seek clarifications. The ethical issue here is whether those observations crossed the line from legal inquiry to a fixed opinion, which would violate the principle that every party deserves an open-minded hearing.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-39 wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"color:#ff0000\"><strong>2. Examine the distinction between \u201cactual bias\u201d and \u201creasonable apprehension of bias\u201d in the context of judicial conduct.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color has-medium-font-size wp-elements-40\"><strong>\u00a0Actual Bias vs. Reasonable Apprehension of Bias<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-41 wp-block-paragraph\">The legal and ethical standards for recusal generally distinguish between these two benchmarks:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color\"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Feature<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Actual Bias<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>Reasonable Apprehension of Bias<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Definition<\/strong><\/td><td>Concrete evidence that the judge has a personal interest or a fixed prejudice that <em>will<\/em> dictate the outcome.<\/td><td>A situation where a &#8220;fair-minded and informed observer&#8221; would conclude there is a real possibility of bias.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Proof Required<\/strong><\/td><td>High; requires proving the judge\u2019s subjective state of mind or a direct financial stake.<\/td><td>Objective; focuses on outward circumstances and public perception.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Focus<\/strong><\/td><td>The <strong>Fact<\/strong> of Partiality.<\/td><td>The <strong>Appearance<\/strong> of Partiality.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>Judicial Maxim<\/strong><\/td><td>&#8220;Justice must be done.&#8221;<\/td><td>&#8220;Justice must not only be done, but must also <strong>be seen to be done.<\/strong>&#8220;<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-42 wp-block-paragraph\">In this case, while there may be no &#8220;actual bias&#8221; (Justice Iyer may truly be impartial), the combination of a family member\u2019s employment by the State and prior critical remarks likely meets the threshold for a <strong>reasonable apprehension of bias<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-43 wp-block-paragraph\">Suggest institutional measures to ensure transparency and fairness in handling recusal requests in the judiciary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color has-medium-font-size wp-elements-44\"><a><\/a><strong>Institutional Measures for Transparency and Fairness<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-45 wp-block-paragraph\">To move away from the current system where the judge being challenged is the sole arbiter of their own recusal, the following measures could be implemented:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"has-black-color has-text-color has-link-color wp-block-list wp-elements-46\">\n<li><strong>Reasoned Orders:<\/strong> Making it mandatory for judges to pass a detailed, written &#8220;speaking order&#8221; when accepting or rejecting a recusal plea. This ensures the decision is subject to legal scrutiny rather than being a purely discretionary act.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Independent Review Mechanism:<\/strong> For high-profile cases, a recusal plea could be referred to a separate &#8220;Recusal Committee&#8221; or the Chief Justice of that court to provide an objective third-party assessment.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Uniform Guidelines:<\/strong> Establishing a clear code of conduct or &#8220;Recusal Rules&#8221; that define specific &#8220;Automatic Disqualification&#8221; triggers (e.g., immediate family members representing a party). This removes the burden of &#8220;perception&#8221; by creating clear red lines.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Full Disclosure Protocol:<\/strong> At the beginning of a case, judges could provide a voluntary disclosure of any potential links (memberships, family roles, or past representation) to the parties involved, allowing for transparency before the trial begins.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Cooling-off Periods:<\/strong> Guidelines regarding judicial participation in politically or ideologically charged public events to prevent the perception of alignment with the &#8220;ruling establishment.&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-color has-link-color wp-elements-47 wp-block-paragraph\" style=\"color:#5100ff\"><strong>Source:<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/epaper.thehindu.com\/ccidist-ws\/th\/th_international\/issues\/182610\/OPS\/G92FSM5QG.1+GN6FTP918.1.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>https:\/\/epaper.thehindu.com\/ccidist-ws\/th\/th_international\/issues\/182610\/OPS\/G92FSM5QG.1+GN6FTP918.1.html<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Analyse the ethical obligations of private schools in implementing Section 12(1)(c). How should conflicts between institutional autonomy and social [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3705,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[68,39,44,33,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3704","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-daily-current-affairs","category-daws","category-ethics","category-gs-4","category-mains"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3704","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3704"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3704\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3706,"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3704\/revisions\/3706"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3705"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3704"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3704"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kingmakersiasacademy.com\/current-affairs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3704"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}